1. The big risk: dependence on oil from Hormuz
1.1 A still heavily carbon-intensive energy mix
1.2 Supply dependent on Hormuz
2. Other things to keep an eye on: gas, aluminium, fertilizers and plastics
3. Transmission channels: value chains, inflation and remittances
3.1 Monitoring critical value chains that depend on these inputs
3.2 Watch out for inflation in the most fragile countries
3.3 Tourism and remittances: the importance of human flows
4. Iranian front leaves US allies exposed
4.1 The opening up of the Iranian front also redraws the geopolitical map in Asia
4.2 What about China?
5. Consult our last publications
Open and tightly integrated into international trade, Asian countries are exposed to the disruption caused by the ongoing conflict in the Gulf. Most of them have reacted quickly, worrying about the impact of the war on energy supplies and trade flows.
The number one risk transmission channel is, of course, oil: suppliers to Asian countries are mainly located in the Gulf, resulting in a direct impact on prices and energy-intensive value chains. In this regard, just about every country in the region is affected, with Indonesia and Malaysia – both oil producers (albeit still net importers) – having a slight edge.
Other raw materials and intermediate goods that pass through the Strait of Hormuz also need to be monitored: gas, of course, which powers production chains in North Asia (South Korea, Japan, Taiwan) and India; and aluminium, plastics made from oil residues, and fertilisers, where a shortage or a sharp increase in prices could weaken the Indian and Indonesian agricultural sectors.
As the conflict drags on, the issue of human flows will become increasingly central: tourist flows to Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand) – much of which passed through the Gulf from Europe – and, above all, flows of workers. For some countries (India, Philippines), the matter of remittances from diaspora populations is far from trivial.
Lastly, the United States’ traditional allies (South Korea, Japan and Taiwan) are already worried about transfers of military manpower and defence capabilities deployed in the area thus far. This shift towards a new conflict zone reinforces the idea that these countries will have to rely more than ever on their domestic and regional resources, rather than on the US, to ensure their security and maintain the necessary deterrence against neighbouring hostile powers (China, North Korea and Russia).
CitationThe ongoing conflict joins the list of shocks already suffered by Asian economies since 2020: Covid-19 which, for some countries, including China, lasted until 2022; the inflationary shock triggered by the war in Ukraine; uncertainties over US import tariffs. While such shocks are ultimately absorbed, they leave visible scars on economies.
The Hormuz blockade once again poses a significant inflationary risk to these countries, against which subsidies remain the only effective tool – if they can afford such measures. Beyond the issue of energy, which exacerbates the weaknesses and dependencies of these carbon-based economies, other value chains will be at the heart of concerns. The issue of fertilisers, which goes hand in hand with food security, will thus be central if the conflict drags on.